<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: SEO: Do .pdf Files Pass Page Rank?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/</link> <description>All the Latest on Search Engine Marketing, WordPress, and Web 2.0</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: How do you rank a PDF file?</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3058</link> <dc:creator>How do you rank a PDF file?</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:39:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-3058</guid> <description>[...] may make some sense from this blog SEO: Do .pdf Files Pass Page Rank?      AffiliateCashPile - The Network That GIVES Methods Away Join the BEST network that gives you [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] may make some sense from this blog SEO: Do .pdf Files Pass Page Rank?      AffiliateCashPile &#8211; The Network That GIVES Methods Away Join the BEST network that gives you [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PatMarcello</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3052</link> <dc:creator>PatMarcello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 13:57:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-3052</guid> <description>Bing does like to see quality content on your page and backlinks from several different sites, and included in those would be article directories (so far). So, I&#039;m guessing the &quot;trust&quot; factor still plays a role, but not quite as big a role as it does now with Google. Remember, Panda is only a few months old.But you&#039;re right... Bing is also still concerned with actual keywords being in the domain, whereas Matt Cutts has said it&#039;s not as important as brand identity with Google.I&#039;ll tell you what... I&#039;ve been paying close attention to Google for many years, but it&#039;s time to start paying attention to Bing, since the &quot;search alliance&quot; formed with Yahoo. That hasn&#039;t quite started to kick in yet, but when it does, they&#039;re estimating a 35% piece of the search traffic pie for the duo. So, it&#039;s time we spent more time worrying about the other guys, too.Thanks for bringing that up. Here are a couple of links for you to check out:http://www.jonathanleger.com/how-to-rank-in-bing/http://www.potpiegirl.com/2010/07/who-cares-about-bing/ (Great video from WebProNews here)- Pat </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing does like to see quality content on your page and backlinks from several different sites, and included in those would be article directories (so far). So, I&#8217;m guessing the &#8220;trust&#8221; factor still plays a role, but not quite as big a role as it does now with Google. Remember, Panda is only a few months old.</p><p>But you&#8217;re right&#8230; Bing is also still concerned with actual keywords being in the domain, whereas Matt Cutts has said it&#8217;s not as important as brand identity with Google.</p><p>I&#8217;ll tell you what&#8230; I&#8217;ve been paying close attention to Google for many years, but it&#8217;s time to start paying attention to Bing, since the &#8220;search alliance&#8221; formed with Yahoo. That hasn&#8217;t quite started to kick in yet, but when it does, they&#8217;re estimating a 35% piece of the search traffic pie for the duo. So, it&#8217;s time we spent more time worrying about the other guys, too.</p><p>Thanks for bringing that up. Here are a couple of links for you to check out:</p><p><a
href="http://www.jonathanleger.com/how-to-rank-in-bing/" >http://www.jonathanleger.com/how-to-rank-in-bing/</a></p><p><a
href="http://www.potpiegirl.com/2010/07/who-cares-about-bing/" >http://www.potpiegirl.com/2010/07/who-cares-about-bing/</a> (Great video from WebProNews here)</p><p>- Pat</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Manan</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3051</link> <dc:creator>Manan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-3051</guid> <description>PageRank is probably one of the most important algorithms ever developed for the Web. 
PageRank is not simply based upon the total number of inbound links. 
The basic approach of PageRank is that a document is in fact considered the more important the more other documents link to it, 
but those inbound links do not count equally.
good points here about Trust now being a major factor in search engine results, 
that goes with what Rand and others have been saying too. 
this also settles for me the value of a natural approach to gaining backlinks and not getting a huge bunch of them, 
or a large # of high pr backlinks in a short period of time - it rather undermines the Trust factor.
I do wonder what you think of bing and how Trust does/will play a role in their results. 
it seems to me from a rather preliminary and cursory look at some results and comparing those to over at google and yahoo, 
that bing ofter relies more on the keyword/s being the actual url, 
which seems to me a rather poor way to rank sites/pages.
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seoexpertlahore.blogspot.com&quot;&gt;seo expert&lt;/a&gt;Thanks for sharing.....</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PageRank is probably one of the most important algorithms ever developed for the Web. <br
/> PageRank is not simply based upon the total number of inbound links. <br
/> The basic approach of PageRank is that a document is in fact considered the more important the more other documents link to it, <br
/> but those inbound links do not count equally.<br
/> good points here about Trust now being a major factor in search engine results, <br
/> that goes with what Rand and others have been saying too. <br
/> this also settles for me the value of a natural approach to gaining backlinks and not getting a huge bunch of them, <br
/> or a large # of high pr backlinks in a short period of time &#8211; it rather undermines the Trust factor.<br
/> I do wonder what you think of bing and how Trust does/will play a role in their results. <br
/> it seems to me from a rather preliminary and cursory look at some results and comparing those to over at google and yahoo, <br
/> that bing ofter relies more on the keyword/s being the actual url, <br
/> which seems to me a rather poor way to rank sites/pages.<br
/> <a
href="http://www.seoexpertlahore.blogspot.com">seo expert</a>Thanks for sharing&#8230;..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PatMarcello</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-2860</link> <dc:creator>PatMarcello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-2860</guid> <description>You got it! Helping folks is why I write the blog, so I appreciate knowing that it&#039;s helpful for you. - Pat</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it! Helping folks is why I write the blog, so I appreciate knowing that it&#8217;s helpful for you. &#8211; Pat</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mold Removal Ontario</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-2859</link> <dc:creator>Mold Removal Ontario</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-2859</guid> <description>This is a very interesting article. Thanks for letting us know about your findings on PDF files.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting article. Thanks for letting us know about your findings on PDF files.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NK</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-2787</link> <dc:creator>NK</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-2787</guid> <description>Interesting article!
For me it is very hot topic. Because I am working in mathematics and have all materials in pdf.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article!<br
/> For me it is very hot topic. Because I am working in mathematics and have all materials in pdf.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PatMarcello</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link> <dc:creator>PatMarcello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 01:13:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-1553</guid> <description>Indeed it is, Derek. Thanks for your comment!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Pat</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it is, Derek. Thanks for your comment!</p><p>- Pat</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Derek</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-1552</link> <dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 19:18:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-1552</guid> <description>Interesting reading. I&#039;ve never bothered with seo for pdfs. Worth trying out.  Cheers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting reading. I&#39;ve never bothered with seo for pdfs. Worth trying out.  Cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PatMarcello</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link> <dc:creator>PatMarcello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 17:41:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-1456</guid> <description>You got it! Thanks for your comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Pat</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it! Thanks for your comment.</p><p>- Pat</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: PatMarcello</title><link>http://www.theseonewsblog.com/2070/seo-do-pdf-files-pass-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-1390</link> <dc:creator>PatMarcello</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 13:41:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.theseonewsblog.com/?p=2070#comment-1390</guid> <description>You got it! Thanks for your comment.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Pat</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You got it! Thanks for your comment.</p><p>- Pat</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 591/592 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.theseonewsblog.com @ 2012-02-08 11:42:49 -->
